<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Revenue River</title>
	<link>http://RevenueRiver.com</link>
	<description>Multiple streams of internet income . . . without the hype</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Pet Peeve: Web 2.0 Gurus Who Really Don&#8217;t Get Web 2.0 by make money online</title>
		<link>http://RevenueRiver.com/pet-peeve-web-20-gurus-who-really-dont-get-web-20/#comment-821</link>
		<dc:creator>make money online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 21:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://RevenueRiver.com/pet-peeve-web-20-gurus-who-really-dont-get-web-20/#comment-821</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;make money online&lt;/strong&gt;

BTW: Bainbridge\'s distortions aside, the Posner position also seems wacky to me. The idea that common law should orient toward maximizing wealth, and the legislature should worry about distribution, seems strange: I always thought that common law sh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>make money online</strong></p>
<p>BTW: Bainbridge\&#8217;s distortions aside, the Posner position also seems wacky to me. The idea that common law should orient toward maximizing wealth, and the legislature should worry about distribution, seems strange: I always thought that common law sh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Carnival of the Capitalists Spammer Exposed by Paradox</title>
		<link>http://RevenueRiver.com/carnival-of-the-capitalists-spammer-exposed/#comment-580</link>
		<dc:creator>Paradox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 05:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://RevenueRiver.com/carnival-of-the-capitalists-spammer-exposed/#comment-580</guid>
		<description>Looks like akismet is catching them. Saw this, and their posts looked legit, but after reading up, i wont let this through. Thanks for the heads up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like akismet is catching them. Saw this, and their posts looked legit, but after reading up, i wont let this through. Thanks for the heads up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Carnival of the Capitalists Spammer Exposed by Matthew</title>
		<link>http://RevenueRiver.com/carnival-of-the-capitalists-spammer-exposed/#comment-502</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 04:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://RevenueRiver.com/carnival-of-the-capitalists-spammer-exposed/#comment-502</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this post.  I recently started a blog and all of a sudden I'm getting comments that seemed very out of place.  This really helped me realize that they weren't meaningful comments!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post.  I recently started a blog and all of a sudden I&#8217;m getting comments that seemed very out of place.  This really helped me realize that they weren&#8217;t meaningful comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CotC Will Be a Little Late, No Thanks to Sploggers by Richard Mclaughlin</title>
		<link>http://RevenueRiver.com/cotc-will-be-a-little-late-no-thanks-to-sploggers/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Mclaughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 09:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://RevenueRiver.com/cotc-will-be-a-little-late-no-thanks-to-sploggers/#comment-359</guid>
		<description>the blogs in question are also posting with a false date.  I have an ezine article that was not approved because I used too many web ites referenced, and I didn't get back to fix it for well over a week. When I got it down to 3 links the article was published on the 29th of the month. When I found that it had been scrapped, they posed it with a date of the 28th - the day before. If Google were to look it would appear that I copied the article and added hyperlinks to the text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the blogs in question are also posting with a false date.  I have an ezine article that was not approved because I used too many web ites referenced, and I didn&#8217;t get back to fix it for well over a week. When I got it down to 3 links the article was published on the 29th of the month. When I found that it had been scrapped, they posed it with a date of the 28th - the day before. If Google were to look it would appear that I copied the article and added hyperlinks to the text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pet Peeve: Web 2.0 Gurus Who Really Don&#8217;t Get Web 2.0 by Richard Mclaughlin</title>
		<link>http://RevenueRiver.com/pet-peeve-web-20-gurus-who-really-dont-get-web-20/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Mclaughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 09:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://RevenueRiver.com/pet-peeve-web-20-gurus-who-really-dont-get-web-20/#comment-358</guid>
		<description>funny, I agree with you but sometimes you have to claim authority to have people listen. Not web related, but I was an instructor for parachuting (military) and scuba diving (civilian) when my boss asked me to help him teach something. Since I was already an instructor he inroduced me as that - "RM will be teaching you x today, he is a certified instructor (no expertise listed) and you will listen to everything he says." The people listening heard what I said - text I had learned for the training - and then went out with a certified instructor for hands on. 
Since the hands on process for the web is done without an instructor present, anyone can get away with being more of an expert than they are.
Teaching at the 'teacher of teachers' level is where you can't fake it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>funny, I agree with you but sometimes you have to claim authority to have people listen. Not web related, but I was an instructor for parachuting (military) and scuba diving (civilian) when my boss asked me to help him teach something. Since I was already an instructor he inroduced me as that - &#8220;RM will be teaching you x today, he is a certified instructor (no expertise listed) and you will listen to everything he says.&#8221; The people listening heard what I said - text I had learned for the training - and then went out with a certified instructor for hands on.<br />
Since the hands on process for the web is done without an instructor present, anyone can get away with being more of an expert than they are.<br />
Teaching at the &#8216;teacher of teachers&#8217; level is where you can&#8217;t fake it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pet Peeve: Web 2.0 Gurus Who Really Don&#8217;t Get Web 2.0 by Carl Pruitt</title>
		<link>http://RevenueRiver.com/pet-peeve-web-20-gurus-who-really-dont-get-web-20/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Pruitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://RevenueRiver.com/pet-peeve-web-20-gurus-who-really-dont-get-web-20/#comment-306</guid>
		<description>I never fill those refer a friend boxes out anymore exactly because of the usually smarmy emails. In their defense, I don't think most of the gurus had anything to do with this marketing. It is just a directory where someone got permission to publish some of their information and use their name.

Geared toward "newbies" who probably don't hesitate to use that tell a friend form!
Thanks,

Carl Pruitt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never fill those refer a friend boxes out anymore exactly because of the usually smarmy emails. In their defense, I don&#8217;t think most of the gurus had anything to do with this marketing. It is just a directory where someone got permission to publish some of their information and use their name.</p>
<p>Geared toward &#8220;newbies&#8221; who probably don&#8217;t hesitate to use that tell a friend form!<br />
Thanks,</p>
<p>Carl Pruitt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Carnival of the Capitalists Spammer Exposed by John Furst</title>
		<link>http://RevenueRiver.com/carnival-of-the-capitalists-spammer-exposed/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>John Furst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 03:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://RevenueRiver.com/carnival-of-the-capitalists-spammer-exposed/#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Charan A. from Carnival of Small Business Issues has posted info about some splogs that I detected today. If you are interested in additional info, please, contact me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charan A. from Carnival of Small Business Issues has posted info about some splogs that I detected today. If you are interested in additional info, please, contact me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Penn &#038; Teller Did For Magic by Scott Allen</title>
		<link>http://RevenueRiver.com/what-penn-teller-did-for-magic/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 01:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://RevenueRiver.com/what-penn-teller-did-for-magic/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Thanks, John. Unfortunately, I've been SO busy with my speaking and consulting the past few weeks that I haven't had time to come do all the cool stuff here that I planned.  I *will* get back to it though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, John. Unfortunately, I&#8217;ve been SO busy with my speaking and consulting the past few weeks that I haven&#8217;t had time to come do all the cool stuff here that I planned.  I *will* get back to it though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Penn &#038; Teller Did For Magic by John W. Furst</title>
		<link>http://RevenueRiver.com/what-penn-teller-did-for-magic/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>John W. Furst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 01:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://RevenueRiver.com/what-penn-teller-did-for-magic/#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Your mission of uncovering scams and educating the Internet community is noble and challenging. Your analogy to magic and Penn &#38; Teller hits the bulls-eye in the center. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your mission of uncovering scams and educating the Internet community is noble and challenging. Your analogy to magic and Penn &amp; Teller hits the bulls-eye in the center. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Flixya - Make Money for Sharing Videos &#038; Photos by Sharerevmedia.com</title>
		<link>http://RevenueRiver.com/flixya-make-money-for-sharing-videos-photos/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharerevmedia.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 04:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://RevenueRiver.com/flixya-make-money-for-sharing-videos-photos/#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Sharerevmedia Offers 50-100% ad revenue for sharing video, also for sharing picture, blogpost and even from user own profile page..So all you have to register there..and get some extra cash .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharerevmedia Offers 50-100% ad revenue for sharing video, also for sharing picture, blogpost and even from user own profile page..So all you have to register there..and get some extra cash .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
