<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Revenue River</title>
	<link>http://RevenueRiver.com</link>
	<description>Multiple streams of internet income . . . without the hype</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Free Network Marketing Teleclasses in October by advertising publicity</title>
		<link>http://RevenueRiver.com/free-network-marketing-teleclasses-in-october/#comment-1279</link>
		<dc:creator>advertising publicity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://RevenueRiver.com/free-network-marketing-teleclasses-in-october/#comment-1279</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;advertising publicity...&lt;/strong&gt;

Person lands on your website and you offer a newsletter to get discounts, free products, and an informational package on“ how to train your dog to be smarter than Lassie”. Person opts into the newsletter and gets a thank you page that says somethin...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>advertising publicity&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Person lands on your website and you offer a newsletter to get discounts, free products, and an informational package on“ how to train your dog to be smarter than Lassie”. Person opts into the newsletter and gets a thank you page that says somethin&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Hardest Way to Make Money Online by affiliate marketing mlm network</title>
		<link>http://RevenueRiver.com/the-hardest-way-to-make-money-online/#comment-1257</link>
		<dc:creator>affiliate marketing mlm network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 07:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://RevenueRiver.com/the-hardest-way-to-make-money-online/#comment-1257</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;affiliate marketing mlm network...&lt;/strong&gt;

It is the first affiliate program allowing you see your conversions relating to specific keywords, how good is that? I say, very good. The features of this program just keep getting better because you will not only receive notifications of events via y...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>affiliate marketing mlm network&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>It is the first affiliate program allowing you see your conversions relating to specific keywords, how good is that? I say, very good. The features of this program just keep getting better because you will not only receive notifications of events via y&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Make Money with Embedded News Video from TheNewsRoom by koala</title>
		<link>http://RevenueRiver.com/make-money-with-embedded-news-video-from-thenewsroom/#comment-1133</link>
		<dc:creator>koala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 04:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://RevenueRiver.com/make-money-with-embedded-news-video-from-thenewsroom/#comment-1133</guid>
		<description>thank you for you share this program.but very frustrate,in my country,it is very slowly to loin to TheNewsRoom .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you for you share this program.but very frustrate,in my country,it is very slowly to loin to TheNewsRoom .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pet Peeve: Web 2.0 Gurus Who Really Don&#8217;t Get Web 2.0 by make money online</title>
		<link>http://RevenueRiver.com/pet-peeve-web-20-gurus-who-really-dont-get-web-20/#comment-821</link>
		<dc:creator>make money online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 21:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://RevenueRiver.com/pet-peeve-web-20-gurus-who-really-dont-get-web-20/#comment-821</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;make money online&lt;/strong&gt;

BTW: Bainbridge\'s distortions aside, the Posner position also seems wacky to me. The idea that common law should orient toward maximizing wealth, and the legislature should worry about distribution, seems strange: I always thought that common law sh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>make money online</strong></p>
<p>BTW: Bainbridge\&#8217;s distortions aside, the Posner position also seems wacky to me. The idea that common law should orient toward maximizing wealth, and the legislature should worry about distribution, seems strange: I always thought that common law sh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Carnival of the Capitalists Spammer Exposed by Paradox</title>
		<link>http://RevenueRiver.com/carnival-of-the-capitalists-spammer-exposed/#comment-580</link>
		<dc:creator>Paradox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 05:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://RevenueRiver.com/carnival-of-the-capitalists-spammer-exposed/#comment-580</guid>
		<description>Looks like akismet is catching them. Saw this, and their posts looked legit, but after reading up, i wont let this through. Thanks for the heads up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like akismet is catching them. Saw this, and their posts looked legit, but after reading up, i wont let this through. Thanks for the heads up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Carnival of the Capitalists Spammer Exposed by Matthew</title>
		<link>http://RevenueRiver.com/carnival-of-the-capitalists-spammer-exposed/#comment-502</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 04:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://RevenueRiver.com/carnival-of-the-capitalists-spammer-exposed/#comment-502</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this post.  I recently started a blog and all of a sudden I'm getting comments that seemed very out of place.  This really helped me realize that they weren't meaningful comments!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post.  I recently started a blog and all of a sudden I&#8217;m getting comments that seemed very out of place.  This really helped me realize that they weren&#8217;t meaningful comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CotC Will Be a Little Late, No Thanks to Sploggers by Richard Mclaughlin</title>
		<link>http://RevenueRiver.com/cotc-will-be-a-little-late-no-thanks-to-sploggers/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Mclaughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 09:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://RevenueRiver.com/cotc-will-be-a-little-late-no-thanks-to-sploggers/#comment-359</guid>
		<description>the blogs in question are also posting with a false date.  I have an ezine article that was not approved because I used too many web ites referenced, and I didn't get back to fix it for well over a week. When I got it down to 3 links the article was published on the 29th of the month. When I found that it had been scrapped, they posed it with a date of the 28th - the day before. If Google were to look it would appear that I copied the article and added hyperlinks to the text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the blogs in question are also posting with a false date.  I have an ezine article that was not approved because I used too many web ites referenced, and I didn&#8217;t get back to fix it for well over a week. When I got it down to 3 links the article was published on the 29th of the month. When I found that it had been scrapped, they posed it with a date of the 28th - the day before. If Google were to look it would appear that I copied the article and added hyperlinks to the text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pet Peeve: Web 2.0 Gurus Who Really Don&#8217;t Get Web 2.0 by Richard Mclaughlin</title>
		<link>http://RevenueRiver.com/pet-peeve-web-20-gurus-who-really-dont-get-web-20/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Mclaughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 09:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://RevenueRiver.com/pet-peeve-web-20-gurus-who-really-dont-get-web-20/#comment-358</guid>
		<description>funny, I agree with you but sometimes you have to claim authority to have people listen. Not web related, but I was an instructor for parachuting (military) and scuba diving (civilian) when my boss asked me to help him teach something. Since I was already an instructor he inroduced me as that - "RM will be teaching you x today, he is a certified instructor (no expertise listed) and you will listen to everything he says." The people listening heard what I said - text I had learned for the training - and then went out with a certified instructor for hands on. 
Since the hands on process for the web is done without an instructor present, anyone can get away with being more of an expert than they are.
Teaching at the 'teacher of teachers' level is where you can't fake it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>funny, I agree with you but sometimes you have to claim authority to have people listen. Not web related, but I was an instructor for parachuting (military) and scuba diving (civilian) when my boss asked me to help him teach something. Since I was already an instructor he inroduced me as that - &#8220;RM will be teaching you x today, he is a certified instructor (no expertise listed) and you will listen to everything he says.&#8221; The people listening heard what I said - text I had learned for the training - and then went out with a certified instructor for hands on.<br />
Since the hands on process for the web is done without an instructor present, anyone can get away with being more of an expert than they are.<br />
Teaching at the &#8216;teacher of teachers&#8217; level is where you can&#8217;t fake it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pet Peeve: Web 2.0 Gurus Who Really Don&#8217;t Get Web 2.0 by Carl Pruitt</title>
		<link>http://RevenueRiver.com/pet-peeve-web-20-gurus-who-really-dont-get-web-20/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Pruitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://RevenueRiver.com/pet-peeve-web-20-gurus-who-really-dont-get-web-20/#comment-306</guid>
		<description>I never fill those refer a friend boxes out anymore exactly because of the usually smarmy emails. In their defense, I don't think most of the gurus had anything to do with this marketing. It is just a directory where someone got permission to publish some of their information and use their name.

Geared toward "newbies" who probably don't hesitate to use that tell a friend form!
Thanks,

Carl Pruitt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never fill those refer a friend boxes out anymore exactly because of the usually smarmy emails. In their defense, I don&#8217;t think most of the gurus had anything to do with this marketing. It is just a directory where someone got permission to publish some of their information and use their name.</p>
<p>Geared toward &#8220;newbies&#8221; who probably don&#8217;t hesitate to use that tell a friend form!<br />
Thanks,</p>
<p>Carl Pruitt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Carnival of the Capitalists Spammer Exposed by John Furst</title>
		<link>http://RevenueRiver.com/carnival-of-the-capitalists-spammer-exposed/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>John Furst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 03:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://RevenueRiver.com/carnival-of-the-capitalists-spammer-exposed/#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Charan A. from Carnival of Small Business Issues has posted info about some splogs that I detected today. If you are interested in additional info, please, contact me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charan A. from Carnival of Small Business Issues has posted info about some splogs that I detected today. If you are interested in additional info, please, contact me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
